Should your cash-pay practice accept insurance?
Test measured demand, conservative economics, operating fit, and a safe way back out before you change how your practice gets paid.
Guides & writing
I build administrative and financial infrastructure for behavioral health in the US. These pieces come from that work: matching people with therapists, running provider networks, filing claims, and helping practices decide how they get paid.
If you run a practice, start with the guides on insurance. If you’re building or leading a healthcare company, the essays below cover payers, claims automation, access, and choosing technology leadership.
For practices
Both guides help an independent practice test the decision with its own numbers before changing how it gets paid. When you’re ready to try one lane, Claims Native is the product I’m building for that work.
Test measured demand, conservative economics, operating fit, and a safe way back out before you change how your practice gets paid.
Map every insurance queue to an owner, a stop rule, proof of completion, and backup coverage before you decide a new hire is unnecessary.
For founders and operators
Essays on selling to payers, automating claims without inventing certainty, turning a match into care, and choosing who should own your technology decisions.
Compare advisors, agencies, fractional CTOs, and strategy partners by what each will own, the evidence behind them, and the outcome you receive.
Five operating realities to understand before you sell to or integrate with a health plan, from benefit design to truthful transaction states.
Prepared, submitted, accepted, and paid are different facts. Keep state, authority, approvals, retries, and evidence explicit before you automate.
A good match only starts access. Provider data, navigation, network participation, and payment decide whether a recommendation becomes care.
How I design healthcare products around the outcome, workflow, authority, transaction, and evidence that make a result dependable.
Working with me in healthcare
Executive product and technology leadership for behavioral health and healthcare companies facing architecture, delivery, and growth decisions.
Turn a complicated care or administrative workflow into a product buyers understand, teams can deliver, and evidence can support.
AI workflows that take on preparation and checks in healthcare administration while people keep consequential judgment.
Two weeks on one costly clinical, claims, or administrative workflow, ending in a build, buy, change, or stop decision.
Ask me a question
Tell me which piece brought you here and what you’re trying to decide. I’ll reply with what I would look at first, and whether one of my offers fits.