Choose the workflow and result
Name the trigger, owner, current cost, risk, desired outcome, and evidence needed for a pilot decision.
Fixed-scope offer · Two weeks
Bring one costly clinical, claims, or administrative workflow. In two weeks, Atom & Bits maps each step, sets the limits for safe automation, and gives your team a pilot decision and build plan.
When this fits
Use the assessment before you approve a vendor, hire a team, or ask staff to work around another unfinished tool.
How the two weeks work
We begin by examining your real process, rules, examples, and constraints, before choosing a model or vendor.
Name the trigger, owner, current cost, risk, desired outcome, and evidence needed for a pilot decision.
Follow the inputs, systems, rules, handoffs, delays, exceptions, and decisions that shape the result.
Set system authority, human controls, failure paths, measures, cost range, and the next 90 days of work.
What you receive
Each item names the owner, evidence, and next action. Your team can use these files with Atom & Bits, another partner, or its own staff.
Triggers, inputs, systems, rules, handoffs, wait states, exceptions, decisions, and outcomes.
What rules can do, where AI may help, what a person must decide, and what the system must never do.
A small test, system outline, measures, cost range, owners, risks, and next 90 days.
Build, buy, change the process first, or stop. I explain why, what evidence supports it, what remains unknown, and what approval comes next.
An assessment does not include production software, vendor implementation, model training, legal advice, a security audit, or HIPAA certification. Those require separate scope and review.
Why Ian Harman
Ian has worked inside behavioral health networks, care delivery, clinical matching, claims, payment, and payer systems.
TheraMatch and TPN Match reached $1 million in ARR and more than 1 million lives under care in less than 12 months. Ian co-founded TheraMatch, which TPN.health acquired in 2025, and led the acquisition and integration.
Product and technology work across provider-network data, EDI, payer rules, claims, remittance, payment, and control states.
Ian developed the initial AI infrastructure for provider SOAP notes. Charting time fell from 22 to 17.5 minutes across all encounters while maintaining or improving both clinician and patient satisfaction.
Common questions
Bring one repeated workflow with a named owner, clear pain, and an outcome you can measure. Good examples include clinical documentation, prior work for a claim, exception review, payer-rule checks, provider data, or administrative follow-up.
No. We may recommend rules, integration, a process change, AI, or a mix. Our assessment may also show that the team should stop or wait.
Ian needs the workflow owner, a few people who carry out these tasks, the rules they use, and representative artifacts. Use de-identified examples. Do not send protected health information by email.
We agree on a fixed fee before kickoff. A 30-minute fit call confirms the workflow, access, scope, and price.
Your team can use the plan itself, hire another partner, or ask Atom & Bits to help build the pilot. You do not have to commission further support.
Start with one workflow
In the fit call, I’ll tell you whether the assessment fits, what access it needs, and what the fixed fee will be. If it does not fit, I’ll say so. This is the healthcare version of my Product & AI Assessment, and that page covers how the two weeks run in more detail.
Related reading
Guides for practices and essays for founders and operators, gathered in one place.